Skip to main content

What It's Really About (RE: The New LDS Policy on Gay Couples & Their Children)


It's not that we don't get the point that you're trying to make about protecting the children- which of course we don't agree with.

It's not that we're making a mountain out of a mole hill, either.

It's that the church is reiterating, loud and clear, that these beautiful people who are just as good and kind and deserving of happiness as heterosexuals or otherwise and didn't 'choose' their sexuality anymore than I chose mine, are grievous sinners when they choose to live as their authentic selves.

Shouting from the rooftops. Gay marriage is a grievous sin. We're protecting the children from confusion.

Confusion from what? From the confusion that the church creates by deeming homosexuality a sin. The church creates the confusion. A loving couple wants to raise children of their own- love them, nurture them, champion them, guide them. And when the child realizes the church's rhetoric, harmful disgusting rhetoric about their loving parents, you're damn right it's going to cause confusion.

THIS, this is what is at the root of our outrage, our pain from this. You are conceding that the church deems the parents of these precious children grievous sinners.

Tolerance malarkey and pretense of acceptance.

So many members were confused and thought the leak of the excerpt of the handbook was a hoax, but then when that woman who compared the movie, Frozen, to  perpetuation of the gay agenda,  published a blog post defending the church's reasons, those confused members did a complete about-face (quoting another post I read).

Or maybe it was Christofferson's inadequate statement -adequate enough for you to be able to shelve this and sleep at night.

You simply cannot liken this 'protection' to similar policy involving children of polygamy. Polygamy is a choice. Your sexuality is not.

And how many things can you really shelve in a lifetime? How many times can you just accept issues you can't reconcile in your heart and put on the back burner for when you 'get to see Heavenly Father'   and ask him all your unanswered questions. Is your faith really enough when it comes to equality? Decency?

Members had 'faith' for decades regarding the 'doctrine' on blacks and the priesthood. And then nearly 40 years after lifting the ban, the church issued a statement claiming it never really was doctrine, only racist, RACIST, men leading the church.

Talk to me more about faith.

Talk to me about prophets being the mouthpieces of God for decades of non-doctrinal injustice toward black members.

Talk to me more about this being the one true church.

The one true church which claims to have Jesus Christ at its head should have been ahead of the racism nightmare in this country, not a straggler.  The church should have been the Poster Child for equality from DAY ONE. 

When an organization is straggling behind everyone else when it comes to justice and equality, that's a culture. Not gospel.   Certainly not a Gospel of Love. 

And now, back to this.  Today.  The current issue. 

Your rhetoric about faith and not needing to understand all things is what's hurting us the most.  There isn't whole lot to understand here.  It's abhorrent. 

It's drawing a line in the sand. 


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. Replies
    1. Sorry, posted twice for some reason. Surprised you haven't gotten more feedback. It's so good!

    2. Sorry, posted twice for some reason. Surprised you haven't gotten more feedback. It's so good!

  3. Mosiah 3:19

    It doesn't matter if you were born gay or decided to become gay. It's still wrong. Just because I was born this way doesn't mean I should act on it. My 'authentic self' as defined by the great and spacious building of Babylon is not what my Heavenly Father wants for me. I made a choice not to act as my natural self would have me, but as my Father in heaven has commanded.

    1. Nobody "decides to become gay". The ignorance of some people never fails to amaze me.

    2. Allow me to clarify please::

      It doesn't matter if it's genetic or environmental, it is still wrong.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Counterfeit Experience of the Straight Spouse

The conversation has to continue as long as the wrong people keep bringing it up (April 2017, Ensign pg. 33).

The further I get from my experience in a mixed-orientation marriage, the more acute my understanding of how my experience, as the straight spouse, is and was marginalized.

Don't get me wrong! I'm the biggest cheerleader for the gay spouse, feeling trapped and unable to live authentically.  I'm the one banging on the other side of the closet door, begging, "Sweetheart, come on.  Stop doing this to yourself.  It's 2017 and depression or suicide is so unnecessary for THIS." 

But there are also the experiences of the men and women who are/were the straight spouse, like... Ashley 1.0.

We aren't living authentically either.

And our suffering and scars don't seem too important. You may have read about how I super duper wanted to drive my mini-van off of Cedar mountain. 

If you're just joining this conversation:  No, it is not just about sex. …

In Which I Feel Compelled to Start a Blog Because of a Club and a Unicorn...

My name is Ashley.  I was Mormon for the first 36 years of my life.

Yep, I was baptized when I was 8.  I went to BYU where I received a Bachelors in Theatre.  I married a returned missionary in the Mt. Timpanogas Temple.  We were full tithe payers.  I fulfilled several callings diligently, including serving as Primary President for 2 years.

About a year after my divorce, I was chatting with my new bishop, who I had known for several years prior to that.  He asked me, "So, Ashley, why did you and Matt get divorced?"

I replied, "Matt is a homosexual."

I just looked him in the eye after I said this and waited a few seconds while he absorbed it.

Then he asked, "Well, was there another problem as well?  Like drinking? Or gambling?"
I looked him in the eye a second time and replied, "Nope.  Just that."

He was genuinely confused.


I was in a mixed-orientation marriage- a marriage between someone who is gay and someone who i…

The White Man

Let's leave this ambiguous.

Also, I'm not gonna tell you about experiences that took place with just one white man. For this, I'll make it one lumpy conceptual White Cisgender Heterosexual Conservative Male (cue the music from the 'Beef-It's What's For Dinner!' music).

In the work force, I have to deal with him. I have to play the game of diplomacy without compromising who I am. If it's mental gymnastics, it's the balance beam in heels with someone patting me on the head saying, "Gosh, I just don't know how you do that! I never could do that! But here are some pointers! Hey! Why did you do it like that?? Why aren't you listening?"

...but I just keep doing my thing.

Utah is the type of prime real estate, and certainly not the most prime, where this guy is King. Everything around him is his dominion. He is not a part of a group that is marginalized. For those of you who do not understand what I mean, I'll present you with the ext…